Would the model mean that Fannie Mae could be labeled an “honest” company? Why or why not?
“During the Great Depression, as borrowers
defaulted on mortgages and banks found themselves strapped for cash, President
Franklin D. Roosevelt and Congress created Fannie Mae in 1938 in order to buy
mortgages from lenders, freeing up capital that could go to other
borrowers. Fannie Mae grew so large over
the years that in 1968, with the pressures of the Vietnam War straining the
national budget, President Lyndon Johnson took Fannie Mae's debt portfolio off
the government balance sheet…” (Pickert, 2008). Fannie Mae is not an honest company, they do
not comply with the United States Government rules and regulations, it seems
that they decide to do what they want at anytime and no one can tell them what
to do. During an incident with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), they wanted to get Fannie Mae to
register their securities as many other organizations had done in the past but
there were a few Congress persons that came out of the woodwork to rally around
Fannie Mae and the SEC dropped the request for registration (Jennings, 2012, p.
129).
Fannie Mae on its’ website describes themselves as a legitimate company
who are honest and is there for the families that are not able to purchase a
home and to all the other individuals that need assistance to keep their homes
from being taken away from them due to not being able to pay their mortgage on
time. The company might have been an
honest firm at one time but it seems that since the late 1990s until 2008 the
company has been risking lots of money on bad investments and not complying
with the laws of the United States Government.
It seems that the personnel at the very top of Fannie Mae’s organization
should be concerned about the welfare of the firm and would look out for the
companies’ best interest. That was not
the case here as for the personnel that have been in charge were more concerned
about their next big bonus than what Fannie Mae really stood for, the company
is not ethical at all by any means.
References
No comments:
Post a Comment